This year is looking like a bumper year for papers from the lab and collaborations, past and ongoing. Over the summer hiatus three papers came out online in their version-of-record form. The first of these was a paper on work that Emma Wiik, a former postdoc in my lab and Peter Leavitt’s lab, conducted to further our research on the controls on CO2 exchange between lakes and the atmosphere.
Lakes play an important role in processing terrestrial carbon and influence carbon fluxes at the global scale. Unpacking the detail of the respective controls on CO2 exchange with the atmosphere is an active and productive area of limnological research. In 2015, we published (Finlay et al., 2015) an analysis of time series data of CO2 flux from hardwater prairie lakes, which showed that as these lakes warmed due to climate change, the efflux of CO2 from the lakes actually decreased. This result was contrary to those observed in northern Boreal lakes, and reflects the need to study a range of lake types when generalizing from individual research projects to global scale assessments of the role of lakes in the carbon cycle.
Emma’s paper (Wiik et al., 2018), which was published in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences in May, took a closer look than the 2015 paper at the controls on CO2 exchange. Across the six Qu’Appelle lakes in the the 2015 study, we’d focused on trends in pH and CO2 flux and the control of annual CO2 flux by ice-cover duration, yielding results that spoke to the multi-annual to decadal scale relationships between CO2 exchange and the important drivers. In the new paper, we used generalized additive models (GAMs) to model the full 18-year time series of limnological data.
Two GAMs were fitted and described in the paper. The first modelled CO2 flux as a smooth function of lake pH over all six lakes, allowing for lake-specific effects of pH on CO2 as well as accounting for change over time. Our CO2 data were not directly measured, instead being calculated from geochemical equations, including pH. Hence this first model was simply to quantify how much of the variation in CO2 we could explain using pH. As the latter was used to calculate the former, the explained variation was high, but never equal to 1.
Having established that pH was the primary control on CO2 exchange in the six study lakes we wanted to try to model the lake water pH observations using a series of selected climatic and metabolic variables, chosen to reflect the major factors thought to control CO2 exchange. A second GAM was fitted with pH as the response variable and lake specific smooth functions of the metabolic and climatic variables.
Through the second GAM, we were able to show that in the six Qu’Appelle study lakes that metabolic drivers of CO2 flux we more important at the daily–monthly scale than climatic drivers, while the latter were more important at the interannual scale.
Finlay, K., Vogt, R. J., Bogard, M. J., Wissel, B., Tutolo, B. M., Simpson, G. L., et al. (2015). Decrease in CO2 efflux from northern hardwater lakes with increasing atmospheric warming. Nature 519, 215–218. doi:10.1038/nature14172.
Wiik, E., Haig, H. A., Hayes, N. M., Finlay, K., Simpson, G. L., Vogt, R. J., et al. (2018). Generalized additive models of climatic and metabolic controls of subannual variation in pCO 2 in productive hardwater lakes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 123, 1940–1959. doi:10.1029/2018JG004506.